Franchising Solutions
Upholding brand standards across your franchise network
Your customers hold every location to the same expectation, and they don't much care which one they walked into. What varies between locations usually isn't the manual. It's what happens inside the site once the doors open — which is the part you see least of.
How Psych Press helps
We are a firm of organisational psychologists. We measure what your customers actually experience, location by location, and what the people inside each site have come to treat as normal — and we give your franchisees a structured way to screen the people who serve your customers.
Start a conversation with usWhen one location falls short, the brand pays
A franchise brand is a promise that the experience will be much the same wherever a customer finds it. When one location falls short, the customer doesn't always separate that location from the brand — and the brand is what they stop choosing.
What that costs
A location that persistently misses the standard doesn't send you an invoice.
- Customers who don't come back, and never say why
- Complaints that name the brand rather than the location
- Field-team hours that go to the same few sites every quarter
- Money spent putting things right — refunds, replacements, and work done a second time at your expense
- Operations and legal time when a location has to be formally brought back into line
- Marketing spend that delivers first-time customers to your weakest locations
Most responses to this work on the documentation: a clearer manual, more frequent audits, another round of training. Those are worth doing, and most networks have already done them. What they leave unanswered is why the same documentation produces different results in different places.
Why standards slip in some locations and not others
Rarely because the manual is unclear.
Your standards are documented and every franchisee was trained on them before opening. The procedures are identical in every location. The results aren't.
What's more telling is that the gap tends to be stable rather than random. The same handful of locations appear on the exception list this year that appeared on it last year, while others have never needed a second visit. A problem with the procedure would show up more evenly than that.
If the procedures are constant and the outcome varies, the variable is people: the franchisee running the site, and everyone that franchisee hired. The first is settled before the doors open, and choosing well there is what our Franchise Finder is built for. This page is about what happens afterwards — inside a site you visit a few times a year.
Why an audit doesn't tell you what a customer experienced
It measures the location against your manual, on the one day someone was there to watch.
A compliance audit tells you the procedure was followed while your field consultant was standing in the room. That is worth knowing, but it is not the same as knowing what your customers experienced in the weeks either side of that visit. A location can pass an audit while quietly losing its regulars, and usually nothing in your reporting will show it until the sales figures move — by which point the customers who left are a year gone.
An audit measures the location against your manual, at a point in time, through your field team's eyes.
A customer survey measures the location against the customer's expectation, continuously, through theirs.
The value is in asking identically everywhere. Identical questions make the answers comparable, and comparison is what turns a score into a signal: this location, against the rest of your network, this quarter against the last. A single satisfaction number tells you very little. The same number tracked across forty sites tells you which three are moving in the wrong direction while there is still time to do something about it.
You audit the locations you can get to. Your customers are in all of them, all the time.
What a location's culture has to do with its standards
A procedure gets followed when the people at that site treat it as normal.
Every location has a way of doing things that isn't written down anywhere: what the people there treat as acceptable when the site is busy, the queue is long, and nobody senior is present. That, rather than the clarity of the document, is usually what decides whether a documented procedure is actually followed.
It also explains the pattern further up this page. The same locations recur on the exception list because what is normal at those sites has settled somewhere different from what your brand assumes — and a working norm doesn't reset because a manual was reissued or a training day was run.
This is measurable, and it is the kind of thing organisational psychologists have been measuring for a long time. A culture survey across your network reports on the gap between the culture you have declared and the one that actually operates, and on the sub-cultures inside the organisation and how far each has drifted from it. In a franchise network, those sub-cultures can be your locations.
It also tells you something an audit cannot: whether a weak location has a hiring problem, a leadership problem, or a franchisee who has decided the model works better in another form. Those need three different conversations, and the exception list on its own doesn't distinguish between them.
The people on the floor
Someone your franchisee hired, not someone you did.
You set the standard and you train the franchisee. Then a customer walks in and is served by a person you have never met, whose hiring you had no part in. Franchisees hire under conditions you don't control — a shift to fill this week, a thin local pool, and no time. Most have no process beyond an interview, because building one isn't their job and nobody has given them the tools.
What a franchisor can supply is the method: a short structured screen the franchisee runs before the interview, asking the same things of every applicant and comparing them with the people already doing the job well in your locations. What it looks for depends on the role — how someone handles a difficult customer at a counter, how they cope with pressure and confrontation on a busy shift, whether they follow store policy when nobody is watching.
How Psych Press helps
We build the instruments and our psychologists interpret the results — across all three of the questions above: what your customers experience, what your locations have become, and who your franchisees hire.
Customer Satisfaction Surveys
SurveyDesigned and run by our psychologists, asked identically in every location, and reported so you can compare across your network and over time. Where you want it, one of our psychologists will talk the results through with you and what they suggest doing next.
Culture Survey
SurveyMeasures the gap between the culture you have declared and the one operating in practice, and reports on sub-cultures and how far each has moved from the centre. In a network, that means seeing which locations have quietly developed their own way of working.
Retail Screening Solution
AssessmentRealistic shop-floor situations for retail applicants, taking 10–15 minutes and run by the franchisee before the interview. It measures problem-solving, following store policy, handling pressure and using initiative in a sale, compares applicants with the people already doing the job well in your own stores, and returns a ranked shortlist the moment they finish.
Hospitality Screening
AssessmentBuilt for hospitality roles: realistic situations on shift, plus questions about how applicants like to work — handling customers, solving problems, service orientation, drive, enjoying people, and coping with confrontation. Useful where turnover is high and a hiring decision often has to be made in a day.
For roles where the customer interaction is the product, the Customer Service Predictor looks more closely at how someone handles people, and sales screening covers selling roles. All of them can run inside our e-recruitment platform, so every location's applicants arrive screened the same way.
Our pricing scales with the situation: how many locations, which roles you screen for, whether customer surveying runs once or continuously, and how much interpretation you want from us. A scoping call is free and gives you a real figure.
What this looks like in practice
A forty-site network starts asking its customers the same six questions in every location, and runs a culture survey across the network at the same time. Within two quarters the data separates three sites from the rest — not the three the field team would have named.
At two of them the picture is consistent. Customer scores sit below the network average, and the culture data shows speed has quietly displaced the parts of the procedure that take longer. Both have also been filling front-line roles in a hurry, from a thin applicant pool, on nothing more than an interview. Screening applicants before interviewing them changes who arrives; the culture data tells the field team what to work on once they do. Over the following quarter both move back toward the network average.
The third is a different problem entirely: the franchisee has been running a version of the model that suits them better. That one takes a different conversation.
Frequently asked questions
How is customer surveying different from a mystery shopping programme?
Mystery shopping tells you what one trained visitor saw on one occasion, measured against your checklist. A customer survey tells you what your actual customers experienced, in volume, measured against what they expected. They answer different questions and a number of networks run both.
Our franchisees do their own hiring. How does this work in practice?
It stays their decision. The questionnaire sits with them: they send it to applicants themselves and get the result back in plain language, with no training in psychology required to act on it. Franchisors typically fund it centrally and make it available across the network, and some write it into the operations manual for particular roles so that every location hires the same way.
Can applicants fake their answers?
Some will try, and well-built instruments are designed with that in mind. It also helps that the screen isn't a pass mark and isn't the decision — it comes back before the interview, and most of what it does is tell the franchisee what to ask about. Someone who has answered strategically tends to claim strengths that rarely sit together in the same person, and those are the claims that come apart when the franchisee asks for a specific example of having done it.
Won't franchisees see this as head office adding another requirement?
The tools franchisees take up are the ones that solve a problem they already have, and hiring is high on that list — most franchisees have made a hire that cost them a month. Funded by the franchisor, quick to run, and left in the franchisee's hands to use, this reads as support rather than obligation. It also gives them something they would struggle to build alone.
Do franchisees see their own results?
Usually yes, and it tends to be the point. A franchisee who can see how their location compares with the network, on the same measures as everyone else, has something to act on. Reporting can be set up so each franchisee sees their own results against an anonymous network average.
What does it cost?
It depends on the number of locations and how much of the work you want us to do, so we scope it with you. The figure worth putting it next to is what one persistently weak location costs over a five-year agreement — in customers who don't return, field-team time, and a territory you can't reassign.
Start a conversation with us
Tell us about your situation and the support you are looking for. You can write as much as you need.
Or call us on +61 3 9670 0590.